HANUMAN & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All the six appellants have preferred this joint appeal being aggrieved against the judgment and order dated, Feb. 24, 1993 of Additional Sessions Judge, Kotputli, in Sessions Case No. 3/92 (Old No. 47/85) whereby they were convicted and sentenced as under:- <FRM>JUDGEMENT_98_LAWS(RAJ)7_19961.html</FRM> The Court further directed that out of the fine Rs. 5000.00 be paid to the legal heirs of deceased Parta and Rs. 1100.00 each to the injured Smt. Bhoomi and Smt, Santo and Rs. 150.00 to injured Sri Ram.

(2.) The facts of the case have been extensively described in the impugned judgment of the trial Court, as such, we need not repeat them in extension except to give necessary facts, in brief, which are thus:-

(3.) After usual completion of investigation, a charge-sheet came to be filed against the appellants. Accused 'Malkhan' could not be charge-sheeted as he was absconding. After committal, the accused were, tried before the Addl. Sessions Judge, Kotputli, under Sections 148, 302 or 302/149, 325 or 325/149, 448 and 323/149 I.P.C.