BABU MUSALMAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this appeal, the conviction and sentence recorded by the trial court against the appellants which are as under, are being challenged: Accused Conviction R. I. Sentence Fine IN default imprison - ment. 1. Babu U/s 307, IPc 5 year's Rs. 1000/ - 6 month's R. I. 2. Chhotu U/s 326, IPc 1 year's Rs. 200/ - 2 month's R. I. U/s 325, IPc -do - -do - -do - U/s 447, IPc 15day's Nil Nil U/s 148, IPc 3 month's Nil Nil 3. Jumma U/s 325, IPc 4 years Rs. 1000/ - 4 month's R. I. 4. Yasin U/s 324, IPc 2years Rs. 200/ - 1 month's R. i 5. Immamuddin U/s 147, IPc 2 months Nil Nil U/s 148, IPc 2 months Nil Nil U/s 149, IPc 2 months Nil Nil U/s 447, IPc 15 days Nil Nil 6. Farid 7. Bhunman U/s 325,324, 147, 148,149 & 447, IPc released after admonition U/ss. 6 (1) r. w. S. 3 of Probation of Offenders 8. Trilok U/s 147, IPC Act. 9. Nanha 10. Iqbal 11. Gopi U/s 147, IPc Given benefit of S,4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and ordered to be released on furnishing personal bonds and sureties.

(2.) THE substantive sentences of imprisonment were ordered to run concurrently.

(3.) NOW the crucial question is whether the occurrence took place at the field, Khasra No. 518, because an effort has been made by the prosecution to change the place of occurrence to the field of Prabhu adjoining to the field Khasra No. 518. In this respect, it would be necessary to examine the statement of Prabhu (PW 6 ).