REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

KAILASH CHANDRA Appellant

V/S

Gyarsi Devi Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BHARAT SINGH V. KALU SINGH [REFERRED TO]
KEWAL CHAND V. KUNJ BEHARI [REFERRED TO]
AUDH BEHARI SINGH VS. GAJADHAR JAIPURIA [REFERRED TO]
RAM SARAN LALL THE STATE OF PUNJAB VS. DOMINI KUER:MST DOMINI KUER [REFERRED TO]
ASSOCIATED HOTELS OF INDIA LIMITED VS. S B SARDAR RANJIT SINGH [REFERRED TO]
HAZARI VS. NEKI DEAD [REFERRED TO]
MOHD ISMAIL VS. ABDUL RASHID [REFERRED TO]
MISHRILAL HAZARILAL VS. LAXMINARAYAN KISHANLAL [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD ISMAIL VS. ABDUL GANI [REFERRED TO]
GURDEV KAUR VS. CHANAN KAUR [REFERRED TO]
PYARE MOHAN VS. RAMESHWAR [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAN SAHAI VS. SATYA NARAIN [REFERRED TO]
RADHA BALLABH HALDIYA VS. PUSHALAL AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is plaintiffs' second appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption.

(2.) DEFENDANT Nos. 2 to 8 sold a portion of the Haveli situated at Bordi-ka-Rasta, Jaipur in Chowkri Modikhana, to defendant No. 1, Smt. Gyarsi Devi, by a sale deed dated 7-8-1962 for a sum of Rs. 6,000/ -. The plaintiff being a co -sharer in the house had a preferential right of preemption as against the vendee, Smt. Gyarsi Devi who had no share in the said Haveli. It was further asserted in the plaint that the amount of Rs. 6,000/ - stated in the sale deed was fictitious, and in fact, only Rs. 4,000/ - were paid but since in the sale deed it had been shown that Rs. 4,500/ - were paid in the presence of Registrar, the plaintiff was prepared to pre -empt the property for a sum of Rs. 4,500/ - and therefore, the present suit was filed for a decree of pre -emption against the defendants on payment of Rs. 4,500/ -.

(3.) DEFENDANT Nos. 3 to 5 also filed a similar written statement, supporting the defendant No. 1.

Click here to view full judgment.

KAILASH CHANDRA Vs. GYARSI DEVI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address