VINOD KUMAR Vs. CENTRAL BEARUE OF INVESTIGATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel appearing for the CBI.

(2.) AS the petitioners have already given an under -taking, the learned Special Judge, CBI Cases, Jaipur should not have directed, the petitioners to give any further undertaking and should not have made the furnishing of undertaking as a condition for granting bail. The learned Judge has already noticed the fact in his order dated October 24, 1985 that the petitioners have produced an undertaking, which may be kept on record.

(3.) THE application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code is disposed of accordingly.