KANHAIYALAL Vs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner by this writ petition has challenged the order Ex. 6, dated, 11th May, 1983, whereby his services were terminated.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed after due selection by the respondents. Firstly an offer was sent to him and he accepted the same and thereafter appointment order dated 15th December, 1982 Ex. 2 was issued appointing the petitioner as Line Patrol Man. Thereafter papers were sent for verification to the place of his residence i.e. to the District Magistrate, Pali and it was found that the petitioner was convicted by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Pali Under Section 186 IPC and fined to tune of Rs. 100/ -. When this fact came to the notice of the respondents, they issued notice to the petitioner on 22nd March, 1983 asking him whether he was ever convicted Under Section 186 IPC and fine of Rs. 1000/ - was imposed or not. This fact was deliberately concealed by the petitioner, therefore by this notice the petitioner was called upon to submit his reply. The petitioner submitted his reply and thereafter the services of the petitioner was dispsnsed with and a cheque of Rs. 972.17 was sent vide Ex. 6. The present writ petition is directed against this order.

(3.) THE writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.