CHUNNILAL Vs. REVENUE APPELLATE AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner got the Abadi land sold to him by the Gram Panchayat, Morcha by private negotiations, for a sum of Rs. 33.60 paisa, by order dated 30 -9 -1973. Thereafter, the petitioner was granted permission to make construction. The land was abutting and adjoining his property. In pursuance to the permission construction was made by the petitioner. On a complaint the Collector, Udaipur sent a notice Exhibit -1 dated 6 -9 -1977 to the petitioner and, therefore, by order dated 19 -10 -1977 directed the Tehsildar to take action in accordance with law and he upheld the order passed by the Sub -Divisional Officer where by the sale was held to be invalid. The petitioner preferred a revision petition before the Revenue Appellate Authority. The revision petition was rejected on 28 -10 -1978. Counsel for the petitioner urged that the order passed by the Panchayat regarding transfer of Abadi land under Rule 226 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyaya Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961 is appealable to the Panchayat Samiti under Rule 270 and no appeal was filed. The Collector could hear appeal from the order of the Panchayat Samiti under Rule 270. The executive action taken by the Collector was uncalled for. So the order passed by the Collector was without jurisdiction.

(3.) FOR the aforesaid reasons, the order of the Collector is liable to be quashed and set aside and as consequence thereof the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority also deserves to be quashed.