YADU RAJ SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE writ petitions involve common questions of law and almost identical facts and, as such, are being disposed of by this common order.

(2.) FOR deciding these three writ petitions I shall take into consideration the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1638, Yadu Raj Singh v. The State Raj. and Ors. The controversy lies in a narrow compass and may be stated thus: The petitioner is a holder of one non -temporary stage carriage permit on Bharatpur -Dholpur via Sapau route bearing No. RTA/85/5183 valid upto 11th March, 1990, in respect of Vehicle No. RSD 2551. The petitioner, Beni Singh, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1640/1986, is a holder of one non -temporary stage carriage permit on Bharatpur -Basedi via Ghana, Malah. Sewar, Uchhain, Kheriamod, Rundhawal, Bandbaretha route in respect of Vehicle No. RSD 3729, and the permit of the petitioner in that case is valid upto 20th March, 1987. Petitioner Daudayal in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1641/1986 is also holding one non -temporary stage carriage permit No. RTA/ 85/5156 for the route Bharatpur -Dholpur via Jagner valid upto 3rd February, 1988, in respect of Vehicle No. RST 8765.

(3.) SECTION 68 -D, which is reproduced below, deals with draft scheme. It provides that draft scheme is required to be published in the official gazette and atleast in one newspaper in regional language circulating in the area or route which is proposed to be covered by the scheme. Objections under Section 68D may be filed by any person likely to be affected by the scheme. Such a person is required to file objection within 30 days from the date of publication of the scheme in the official gazette. Objections are required to be filed before the State Government: