STATE Vs. SANGRAM SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE learned Government Advocate has brought this appeal under sec. 39 of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 1952 against the order of the learned Jagir Commissioner, Jaipur, dated 21. 10. 64 on the ground that the Jagir was unsettled during the basic year Smt. 2010 and although the learned Collector, Sikar had issued the prescribed notices on 1. 3. 56, the respondent had not cared to submit the required details within the specified time. It is averred that the Jagir was subsequently settled before the final award was made and as such the rental income should have been assessed in accordance with the amended R. 9 of the Rules framed under the Jagir Act. It is contended that the learned Jagir Commissioner has made the assessment in contravention of the provisions of secs. 5, 6 and 7.

(2.) IN reply, the learned counsel for the respondent referred to the order of the Board of Revenue dated 28. 4. 60 remanding the case to the Jagir Commissioner with the direction that the rental income of this Jagir should be redetermined in accordance with the provisions of sec. 7 of the Jagir Act and the Rules 3 to 9 made thereunder as the Jagir Guhala was unsettled on the date of resumption.