(1.) HEERCHAND and others plaintiff petitioners have filed this revision petition against Hindu and others defendant petitioners against the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sirohi dated 4. 5. 1963 rejecting the review petition passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer in the Civil suit No. 50/1960.
(2.) THE only contention of the counsel for the petitioner was that the Court committed an error of law in rejecting the review petition of the petitioners in a summary fashion without considering the various points raised by him in the application on merits. He pointed out special errors in the original judgment passed by the learned Court in a civil suit and not one of those errors was touched in rejecting this revision petition of the petitioner. THE counsel for the petitioner contended that revision against the order rejecting the review petition lies. THE reply of the counsel for the respondent was that no revision lies against the order rejecting the review petition.