UMA BALLABH Vs. SHRI RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application in revision wrongly styled as an appeal against the appellate order of the learned Addl. Settlement Commissioner, dated 5. 11. 55 arises under the following cicumstances.

(2.) THE opposite Party Shri Ram, Raghunath, etc. filed and application before the A. R. O. after making necessary enquiries directed by his order dated 18. 6. 51 that these numbers be expunged from the Khatedari of the applicants and entered in the name of the opposite-party. THE applicants went in appeal before the learned Addl. Settlement Commissioner and after a good deal of protracted litigation the case was decided by the Board of Revenue on 19. 10. 54. It was observed by the Board that Krishna Ballabh the father of the applicant had died incorrect and illegal on the part of the Addl. Settlement Commissioner it was appeal without bringing the legal representatives on record. THE learned Addl. Settlement Commissioner by his order, dated 5. 11. 55 directed that Uma Ballabh the applicant who was the son of the deceased Krishna Ballabh be brought on record as the legal representative of the latter, and that appeal be heard on merits. It is against this order that this revision application has been filed.