(1.) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 10/02/2016; whereby the learned Single Judge has issued a direction for payment of the retirement dues but not granted interest on the delayed.
(2.) Counsel for the appellant has contended that the appellant was deprived of her legitimate right in spite of Office Memorandum (in short "OM") issued by the Government of India dated 16/01/2013. However, the record is silent when the letter was written, however, the appellant disputes the same. The view taken by the learned Single Judge reads as under:-
(3.) In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that view taken by the learned Single Judge is just and proper, no interference is required.