RAM SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.

(2.) The instant bail application under Sec. 439 Crimial P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.426/2012, Police Station Sardarshahar for offence under Sec. 8/15 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being implicated in this case solely on the ground that he was the person in control of Maruti Swift car no.PB 31G 0745 from which contraband poppy straw weighing 175 kg. was recovered while the car was lying in an abandoned condition. He urges that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of an agreement executed by Jagjit Singh for the purported sale of car in favour of the petitioner. He submits that as per the admitted material available on record, one Amrit Pal is the registered owner of the said car. He urged that apparently, the so -called agreement on the strength whereof the petitioner is being implicated is unworthy of credence. As per him, there is no material available on the record of the case to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. He thus prays that the petitioner deserves to be granted bail.