S P RATAWAL Vs. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BRIEF facts of the case are that vide letter dated 28. 6. 2004. Deputy Registrar (Academic), University of Rajasthan informed the petitioner that Hon'ble Chancellor while exercising power under Section 21 (1) (v) of the University Act, nominated the petitioner as a member of Syndicate for a term of three years w. e. f. 23. 06. 2004.

(2.) THE controversy arose when vide order dated 14. 9. 2005, in place of petitioner. Hon'ble Chancellor nominated respondent no. 3 as a syndicate member.

(3.) IT is not disputed by the petitioner that the only attended one meeting but on the contrary he submits that he is always taking keen and vital interest in the affairs of Rajasthan University. To show this he referred certain letters which are written by the then Vice Chancellor and the letter which acknowledged and endorsed the service rendered by he petitioner. In this regard it was categorically stated that with regard to the letter dated 27. 9. 2005 issued by Shri K. L. Sharma, the then Vice Chancellor appears to have been issued in a routine manner extending courtesy and gratitude usually expressed by a person relinquishing the office and the respondents along with their additional affidavit also placed another letter which was written to Prof. N. K. Lohiya, Member Syndicate which is virtually the same.