REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAGHUVEER SINGH Appellant

V/S

SHIV KUMAR SWAMI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF BIHAR VS. SHRI ANANT PRASAD AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
KARNATAKA VS. CHINNEN DAS AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. RADHAGOBINDA [REFERRED TO]
BRAHMA PRAKASH SHANNA VS. STATE OT UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. R B CHOWDHARI [REFERRED TO]
PERSPECTIVE PUBLICATIONS P LIMITED VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
C K DAPHTARY VS. O P GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
HAJI C H MOHAMMAD KOYA T K S M A MUTHUKOYA VS. T K S M A MUTHUKOYA:HAJI C H MOHAMMAD KOYA [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS BOMBAY PRIVATE LIMITED BENNETT COLEMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED STATESMAN LIMITED KASTURI AND SONS LIMITED ANANDA BAZAR PATRIKA LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
HARIJAI SINGH VS. VIJAY KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
MRITYUNJOY DAS VS. SAYED HASIBUR RAHAMAN [REFERRED TO]
CHHOTU RAM VS. URVASHI GULATI [REFERRED TO]
ANIL RATAN SARKAR VS. HIRAK GHOSH [REFERRED TO]
RADHA MOHAN LAL VS. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT JAIPUR BENCH [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SAIL VS. MADHAYA PRADESH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION [REFERRED TO]
SUKH RAJ VS. HEMRAJ [REFERRED TO]
BIMAN BOSE VS. STATE OF W.B. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN newspaper ``lok Sammat'' published from Sri Ganganagar dated 24. 2. 2001, the following Headline was published. ***

(2.) UNDER the detailed report dated 24. 2. 2001, it was stated firstly that addressing hundreds of workers assembled in front of Collectorate, Sriganganagar, the leaders of communist Party levelled sharp allegations against judiciary. Incriminating statements were attributed to Het Ram Beniwal, Navrang Choudhary, Bhuramal Swami, Advocate, Hardeep Singh and Sheopat Singh. Following statements were attributed to the respective speakers: ***

(3.) IN response to the show cause notices, firstly a joint reply was submitted by the non-petitioner No. 2 to 6, namely, Het Ram Beniwal, Navrang Choudhary, Advocate, Bhuramal Swami, Advocate, Hardeep Singh, Sarpanch and Sheopat Singh. Apart from alleging oblique motive on the part of the petitioner to move the present application, the respondents No. 2 to 6 in their defence denied making of any such statement as referred in the application and as reported in ``lok Sammat'' and took a stand that whatever stated in the news-item is faise. However, the conduct of meeting at Collectorate, Sri Ganganagar on 23. 2. 2001 was not denied.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAGHUVEER SINGH Vs. SHIV KUMAR SWAMI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address