SANJIV ARORA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY the instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dt.20.02.2004 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) on a complaint filed against the petitioner by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Sri Ganganagar under Section 193 IPC. Aggrieved by the order impugned as also the filing of the complaint against the petitioner, the petitioner has filed the instant Cr. Misc. Petition.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the complaint as also the order impugned taking cognizance.

(3.) BY judgment and order dt. 15.11.2003 in Sessions Case No. 39/2003, learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Sri Ganganagar acquitted all the four accused persons of the charges. However, directed to initiate the proceedings under Section 193 IPC against the present petitioner for making a false statement i.e. perjury and filed the complaint. On that complaint, the trial court took the cognizance and issued the process. Hence, this petition.