AMOD KUMAR SAXENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge who had been pleased to reject the writ petition which had been filed by the petitioner/appellant herein for quashing and setting aside the order dated 15. 6. 2001 by which reference initiated at the instance of the petitioner for referring the dispute to the Industrial/labour Tribunal was rejected as it could be noticed that there was no prima facie dispute in between the petitioner/appellant herein and the respondent-State.

(2.) ON scrutiny of the facts in regard to the dispute raised by the petitioner/appellant herein, it could be traced out that the petitioner/appellant herein submitted an application seeking voluntary retirement which was also signed by two witnesses and the application was accepted by the respondent No. 2, the Divisional Joint Labour Commissioner, Ajmer after which all monetory benefits to which the petitioner/appellant herein was entitled were also paid to him. It could be further noticed that at the time of voluntary retirement, a sum of Rs. 7,70,280/- was paid to the petitioner/ appellant herein towards his retiral benefit which he had duly accepted. Thereafter, he raised a dispute by initiating a reference before the State Government that he had been pressurised to seek voluntary retirement and this was the dispute which should have been referred for adjudication to the Industrial/labour Tribunal.

(3.) THE appeal, thus, has no substance and hence it is dismissed at the admission stage itself. .