(1.) THE petitioner was appointed by the respondent no. 5, the Modern Balika Mandir Uchcha Prathmik Vidyalaya, Brahmpuri, Jaipur, as Teacher Grade-III on 31. 8. 87.
(2.) THE services of the petitioner were terminated vide order dated 27. 11. 95. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the termination order, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Non Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur and the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed by the Tribunal vide its order dated 10. 3. 97.
(3.) HEARD rival submissions of the respective parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred definition clause 2 (1) of the Act of 1989 by which "employee" includes a teacher and every other employee working in a recognized institution. Clause 2 (r) provides "salary" means the aggregate of the emoluments or an an employee including dearness allowance or any other allowance or relief for the time being payable to him but does not include compensatory allowance and clause 2 (s) defines "sanctioning authority" which means an officer authorized by the State Government to sanction aid to such recognized educational institutions as the State Government may specify from time to time in accordance with the procedure to be prescribed.