PUKHRAJ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to quah the order (verbal) passed by the respondent No. 3 by which the nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner is the member of Jodhpur Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Jodhpur (respondent No. 2), As the term of the Board of Directors has already expired, by notification dated 10.11.94 (Annex. 1) published in daily newspaper 'Rajasthan Patrika'. election of Board of Directors was declared. Pursuant to the election programe. the petitioner filed his nomination paper. After scrutiny, on 18.11.94, the nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that in his account Rs. 500/ - was not maintained for two years. This writ petition is directed against the rejection of the nomination paper.

(3.) AS agreed by the learned Counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.