DEVI CHAND Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -

(2.) THIS special appeal is preferred against the order of a learned single Judge dated 7.2.95.

(3.) IT is contended by the counsel for the appellant that the rejection of the nomination paper is devoid of authority and contrary to the provisions of the Act and the Rules, the bye laws framed there under. A surety defaulter is not debarred from contesting election of Board of Directors. On the other hand it is contended by the counsel appearing for respondents no. 1 to 3 that on combined reading of the provisions of the Act, bye laws and Rules, the intention of the legislature is to debar the defaulter surety from contesting the election of the Board of Directors.