ZAMIR ALI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, by this contempt petition, has prayed that the respondent-contemners may be punished for flouting the order passed by this Court as inspite of the judgment passed by this Court in favour of the petitioner, he has been removed from service though the vacancies were available.

(2.) THE petitioner is an untrained teacher. He was given appointment by the Panchayat Samiti. After serving for sometime, his services were terminated and he filed the writ petition challenging the termination of his services. THE High Court, vide judgment dated 22. 8. 88 allowed the writ petition filed by the petitioner in terms of the judgment given in Chanda Tamboli and Ors. vs. Panchayat Samiti, Mandal and Ors. (1 ). A further direction was given that looking to the large number of the teachers involved all over the State of Rajasthan it will be just and fair to determine the vacancies within six months from the date of the judgment and fill up the vacancies in accordance with the law. On the basis of this judgment, the petitioner continued in service upto 10-1-93 and thereafter his services were terminated.