REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

AMIR AHMED Appellant

V/S

YUSUF Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SHIV PRASHAD JAIN V. BRIJ LAL [REFERRED TO]
DR. RAM SARUP V. SMT. SAVITRI DEVI [REFERRED TO]
LAM KEE YING V. LAM SHES TONG [REFERRED TO]
MALASINGH V. HERKIRATSINGH [REFERRED TO]
ABU V. CHAKKYIL [REFERRED TO]
HARISHANKER V. RADHA [REFERRED TO]
MARKS V. WARRAN [REFERRED TO]
SOHANLAL V. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,BULAND SHAHAR [REFERRED TO]
DHARAMCHAND V. KESTURILAL [REFERRED TO]
GURDIAL SINGH VS. BRIJ KISHORE [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL AZIZ VS. MOHAMMAD YAKUB [REFERRED TO]
HAZARI LAL VS. GIANI RAM [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAT PRASAD VS. DWARKA PRASAD [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS reference raises the question regarding construction of the expression 'parted with possession' contained in Section 13(1)(e) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control) of Rent and Eviction) Act, (No. XVII of 1950) ('the Act' here in).

(2.) A learned single Judge of this Court has referred the following questions for consideration by a Division Bench of this Court:

(3.) THE material portion of Section 13 of the Act, for the present purpose, is as under: Section 13. Eviction of tenants -(1) Not with standing anything contained in any law or contract, no court shall pass any decree, or make any order, in favour of a landlord, whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, evicting the tenant so long as he is ready and willing to pay rent therefor, to the full extent allowable by this Act, unless it is satisfied:. ... ...

Click here to view full judgment.

AMIR AHMED Vs. YUSUF

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address