(1.) THIS revision petition has been listed for orders, today. Counsel for the parties have argued the case on merits of the revision petition, as such the revision petition itself is being disposed of by this order.
(2.) THE learned Munsif Magistrate Sri Ganganagar vide order dated 20 -11 -1984 passed an order restraining the defendants to install oil expeller of 20 H.P. in the suit premises. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Munsif Magistrate the defendant filed an appeal before the learned District Judge, Sri Ganganagar, who vide order dated 30th November, 1984 confirmed the order passed by the learned Munsif. It is against this order, revision petition has been preferred.
(3.) I have given my thoughtful consideration to the respective submissions made by the learned Counsel. I am of the view that both the learned lower courts committed no error of jurisdiction and exercised the discretion vested in them in proper manner. However, matter is before the trial court and it will give due consideration to submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner defendants while passing final order.