STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. MANAKLAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE are five applications for revision preferred by the State against the appellate orders of the Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur in proceedings under the Rajasthan Public Demands Recovery Act, 1952, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

(2.) TWO preliminary objections have been raised by the learned counsel on behalf of the opposite party in each case. One is that these applications for revision which have admittedly been presented after the expiry of 90 days from the dates of the impugned orders of the Revenue Appellate Authority are barred by limitation. The other objection is that as required under Rule 17 of the Revenue Courts Manual, the copies of the original orders of the Sub-Divisional Officer which formed the subject matter of the impugned orders of the Revenue Appellate Authority had not been submitted, as such the applications for revision could not be taken to have been properly presented. In case it is held that the period of limitation in these cases is 90 days, the second objection would be very material, but it would lose force if the decision is to the contrary.