LAWS(RAJ)-2025-10-32

RATIRAM YADAV Vs. GOPAL SHARMA

Decided On October 08, 2025
Ratiram Yadav Appellant
V/S
GOPAL SHARMA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These revision petitions arise from the following:

(2.) Since all the revisions are between the same parties and pertain to transaction of same nature containing common question of law, hence all are being disposed of by this common judgment.

(3.) The complainant -petitioner Ratiram Yadav filed four distinct complaints under Sec. 138 of the "N.I. Act" regarding cheque Nos. 132424, 132425, 132426 and 132427 drawn on State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Murlipura Branch, Jaipur, bearing date of year 2013 and issued by accused Gopal Sharma for Rs.1,25,000.00 each. All the cheques were dishonoured on presentation for the reason "insufficient funds". Despite service of legal notice, the accused failed to make payment, compelling the complainant to file the above complaints.