RAMESHWAR PRASAD Vs. STATE OF RAJ & ANR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition is preferred for quashing the FIR No.298/2015 for the offences u/s 420, 406 and 419 IPC registered at Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur wherein allegations against the petitioner are that he introduced himself as an Advocate and received Rs.30,000/- as his legal fees and Rs.15,000/- for making payment to Magistrate as he told that he has talked with Magistrate thereafter periodically he took amount from the complainant and he received total amount as Rs.66,500/- while neither he is an advocate nor he has any power for plead in the court.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the allegations in the FIR are false, the case in which complainant alleges that he enaged him as an advocate, same has already been compromised between the parties. Petitioner has not received money from the complainant, therefore, FIR may be quashed.

(3.) In the matter of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal & Ors., 1992 Supp1 SCC 335 Hon'ble Supreme Court has formulated seven grounds for quashing the FIR which are as under:-