ARIF MOHD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: -

(2.) THE petitioner has impleaded the Secretary -Mines Department, Director -Mines and Geology, Minister of Public Health and Engineer Department, Director General of Police, Superintendent of Police, Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsildar, Mining Engineer (Vigilance) as respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and has impleaded certain private persons as respondent Nos. 10 to 16.

(3.) IT is claimed that as a part of the illegal harassment, a civil suit seeking permanent injunction has been filed, but the respondents could not obtain any relief or injunction pursuant to the same; the respondents are claiming public way in Khasra No. 368, whereas, there is no residence near the allotted mining area and no public way exists; in the year 2009 the petitioner had filed a suit against respondent No. 16 lessee of ML No. 214/96 for clarification of dispute regarding the mining area and public way between the leased areas of the petitioner and respondent No. 16, which suit was eventually withdrawn based on the report of the Tehsildar indicating that the public way falls in the mining area of respondent No. 16 in Khasra No. 368.