TULSI DAS Vs. VIRENDRA SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS intra court appeal arises out of the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 20.2.2013 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 388/2009 by which he had dismissed the writ petition confirming the concurrent findings, recorded by the Rent Tribunal regarding the bona fide need of the landlord as well as the grounds taken in the Rent Appellate Tribunal, and in the writ petition that Shri Virendra Singh, after the death of his mother, ceased to be the landlord and was not competent to continue with the proceedings for eviction. Learned Single Judge after dismissing the writ petition allowed six months' time to the tenant to vacate the shop, subject to the condition of payment of rent and filing an affidavit of undertaking, detailed in the concluding paragraph of the judgment.

(3.) THE proceedings for eviction of the appellant on bona fide need were initiated by Shri Virendra Singh, who had executed the rent agreement vide rent note and was realizing the rent of the shop for last twenty years. The trial court decreed the suit for eviction on the ground of bona fide need.