(1.) BOTH the learned counsel for the parties have advanced arguments and have also relied upon following judgments of Hon'ble the Supreme Court and this Court in support of their rival contentions.
(2.) MR . L.R. Mehta, learned counsel for the appellants/plaintiffs submitted that since initial sale dated 25.07.1975 was void -ab -initio, there was actually no need to file any suit, and the suit even if so filed by the plaintiffs, the same could not be held to be barred by limitation and he relied upon the following judgments: -
(3.) On the other hand Mr. O.P. Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents/defendants submitted that even sales protected by Section 42 of the Act have to be challenged, subject to the law of limitation and he relied upon following judgments: -