VIJAY VISHNOI Vs. JVVNL AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner, who is working as a Technical Helper in the respondent JVVNL, through this writ petition, seeks to assail the legality and validity of the order Annex. P/2 dated 30.6.2015 whereby, he was transferred from Suratgarh to Bikaner.

(3.) MR . Ravi Bhansali, learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the language of the transfer order is not in consonance with the requirement of the Appendix -C of the Travelling Allowance Rules applicable to the employees of the power companies. It is undisputed that the transfer order was not directed on the employee's request and, therefore, it was essential to mention in the transfer order that the transfer was being made in public interest or for administrative reasons.