VIMAL CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard Mr. Vimal Choudhary, the appellant, appearing in person.

(2.) A personal problem of cleanliness of the locality in which the appellant resides, was enlarged by the Court in issuing 16 directions on 31.05.2012. All the directions were in the interest of cleanliness and to maintain hygiene in the City of Jaipur.

(3.) WE are of the view that sufficient steps have been taken by the Nagar Nigam, Jaipur, in compliances of the directions, and that no further monitoring is required to be made. The Nagar Nigam has assured that they will continue to take sincere steps in compliance of the directions issued by the Court.