LAWS(RAJ)-2015-3-427

BHAGWAN LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Decided On March 24, 2015
BHAGWAN LAL Appellant
V/S
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner-accused has challenged the impugned order dated 13.10.2014, passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases No.l, Chittorgarh in Criminal Misc. Case No.226/2014 while invoking revisional jurisdiction vested in this court under Section 401 Cr.P.C. By the order impugned, the Court below dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. wherein he prayed for releasing him on default bail as per provisions under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(2.) The brief facts of the case are that on 12.04.2014, the Station House Officer, Parsoli aong with other police official conducted 'Nakabandi' and at about 9:15 P.M., one Bolero bearing registration No.RJ-09 UA3696 was stopped and on search of the said vehicle, 12.5 kgs. opium was found in bags. On this, the petitioner was arrested on 13.04.2014 and FIR No.69/2014 at Police Station Parsoli was registered and petitioner accused was produced before the learned trial court for custody.

(3.) On 10.10.2014, petitioner-accused preferred an application for releasing him on bail under Section 167(2) Cr.Restating therein that even passing of 180 days after his arrest, prosecution failed to complete investigation and to file charge sheet against the petitioner before the Court, therefore, the Court is not authorised to remand him further and he is entitled for default bail. A copy of application was supplied to learned Special Public Prosecutor, learned Court below instead of deciding the application on same day posted it for 13.10.2014 and on that day, Special Public Prosecutor, learned Special Judge, dismissed the application of the petitioner-accused and allowed the application of Special Public Prosecutor under section 36(A)(4) of the NDPS Act and extended three days time for filing charge sheet and thereafter charge sheet was filed. Against the order by which the application of petitioner-accused was dismissed, this revision petition has been preferred before this Court.