GENERAL MANAGER Vs. LABOUR COURT UDAIPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A common question is involved in both the aforesaid writ petitions, therefore, they are decided by this common order.

(2.) FACTS giving rise to the instant petitions are that the Labour Department made a reference to the Labour Court, Udaipur. On receiving the reference, the Labour Court, Udaipur issued notices to the parties. On receiving notices, respondents submitted their statements of claim and the petitioner-department submitted replies to the said statements of claim. It is claimed by the respondents that before terminating their services, one month's notice or wages of one month or compensation have not been given to them. It is also claimed that the persons appointed after them are still working with the Telecommunications Department.

(3.) IT is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the learned Labour Court, Udaipur has not appreciated the material available on record. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Labour Court has given an incorrect finding that both the respondent Girdhari Lal and Ram Singh have worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year.