INDER KUMAR Vs. HARI PRAKASH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 5. 2. 2005 by which the first appellate court dismissed the petitioner's application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. However, by the same order, even after rejecting the petitioner's application, the first appellate court held that the plea taken by the petitioner- defendant-appellant in the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC will be considered by the appellate court at the time of hearing of the appeal and, therefore, there is no need to allow amendment of the written statement.

(3.) THE petitioner has placed on record the certified copy of the judgment of the Civil Court dated 28. 07. 2004 and the uncertified copy of the judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 1. 05. 2004.