ATMA RAM Vs. JUDGE LABOUR COURT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed that by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned award dated 14. 5. 2001 (Annexure 5) may be quashed and set aside and the he may be reinstated with all consequential benefits.

(2.) BRIEF facts, giving rise to the instant petition, are not initially, vide order No. 12414 dated 27. 9. 1984, the petitioner appointed as daily rated employee. He worked upto March 31, 1985, in different Sections and he completed 142 days and, therefore, he was again appointed vide Order No. 3262 dated 23. 4. 1985 and he worked upto the date of termination, i. e. 10. 8. 1985. Thus, the petitioner claims that he has worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year.

(3.) FEELING aggrieved by the impugned award dated 14. 5. 2001 (Annexure 5), passed by the learned Labour Court, Jodhpur, the petitioner has preferred the instant petition before this Court.