DILIP GUPTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the accused petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner contended that the investigation for offence under Sections 420 and 406 IPC is pending against the applicant. It is then contended that allegations in the complaint discloses a civil dispute between the parties and the complainant also issued a notice demanding Rs. 74080/- from the accused. On this strength learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.