UMESH KUMAR SONI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONER has challenged the order dated 21.11.1995, passed by respondent No. 1 under Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 refusing to refer the dispute in regard to termination of services of petitioner only on the ground that there has been a charge of theft and the resignation tendered by the petitioner having been accepted by the management.

(2.) AFTER hearing counsel for the parties, I have carefully gone through the material on record.

(3.) THE management, on the other hand, has submitted that there has been a charge of theft of travelling cheque and for that reason, the petitioner submitted his resignation on 24.02.1995 and the same was accepted by the management immediately. The decision taken by the respondent Labour Department on administrative side hardly call for the interference of this Court.