RAVI SHANKER SRIVASTAVA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 18.07.2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal) by which, the OA filed by the petitioner was disposed of with the following observation:- "We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and of the view that since the appeal of the applicant against his suspension order is pending before the competent authority and the competent authority has already seized of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice; if the direction is given to the competent authority to decide the appeal of the applicant at this stage. Accordingly, without going into merits of the case, the competent authority is directed to decide the appeal of the applicant against his suspension order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by passing a speaking and reasoned order".

(2.) THE petitioner filed OA before the Tribunal with the following prayer:- (i) quash and set aside the impugned order dated 12.6.2004 by which the applicant has been suspended from service.

(3.) IN view of this observation, we find no fault in the order dated 18.7.2005 passed by the Tribunal and as such it does not require any interference by this court.