BHAGWAN SAHAI Vs. SURESH CHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HAVING heard the submissions advanced before me, I find that no substantial questions of law arise in the instant second appeal.

(2.) CONTEXTUAL facts depict that the suit was instituted by the plaintiffs seeking eviction of defendants from the suit premises on the ground of personal bonafide necessity, substantial damages, nuisance and subletting. The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaipur City (West) dismissed the suit vide judgment and decree dated December 6, 1999. The plaintiffs preferred first appeal in the Court of District Judge Jaipur City, which was transferred to the court of learned Additional District Judge No. 2 Jaipur City, who decreed the suit of the plaintiffs on the ground of personal and bonafide necessity only and reversed the findings of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaipur City (west) to that extent. In the instant second appeal the defendants seek to quash the judgment and decree dated March 3, 2001 of the learned Additional District Judge No. 2 Jaipur City.

(3.) THE submissions canvassed on behalf of the defendant appellants were rejected in toto by the first appellate court by giving its own reasons and I find myself unable to interfere with the findings of first appellate court.