VIJAY PAT SAXENA Vs. SHRI DAMODAR SHARMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) - Heard.

(2.) THE contention of Shri Rajendra Mehta is that once the termination order of the petitioner was held to be illegal, the natural and necessary corollary thereof is that he was entitled for all consequential benefits. On the other hand, the respondents have simply reinstated the petitioner on the post of Work Charge Supervisor on a consolidated pay of Rs. 779. 50 per month, which he was getting on 15. 5. 82 at the time of his termination. According to him, now this post is a non-existent post for which even there is no budget provision. More-over all other similar Work Charge Supervisors have already been absorbed by the respondents as Junior Engineers and have been given regular pay- scale in normal course long back. In such circumstances,the petitioner is also entitled to be absorbed as Junior Engineer and fixed in the regular pay-scale in normal course. For this, Shri Mehta has relied upon the case of Pramod Kumar vs. Laxmi Narayan Sharma (1 ).

(3.) SINCE there was no specific order for giving the consequential benefits to the petitioner in this Court's order dated 18. 2. 93, it can not be contended now that the relief of consequential benefits was implicit in the said order.