VINOD KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to quash the termination order dt. 21.3.94 (Anx.3) and the petitioner may be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. The petitioner prays that a direction may be issued in terms of Moinuddin's case.

(2.) THE facts which are necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this writ petition as alleged by the petitioner are that the petitioner obtained a degree of Shiksha Shastri from the Varanasi Sanskrit Vishwa Vidhyalaya in the year 1987. It is alleged that he applied for the post of Teacher Gr. III advertised by the Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu vide Advertisement No. 1/89 and on being selected by the District Establishment Committee for the said post. He was appointed on probation for a period of two years vide order dt. 1.5.89 (Anx. 1) and he joined duty on 2.8.89 (Anx.2). It is also alleged that the recognition of Shiksha Shashtri granted by the Varanasi Sanskrit Vishvavidhyalaya was withdrawn by the Government of Rajasthan vide order dt. 30.10.92 and consequent thereto order dt. 1.10.93 the Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu directed to terminate the services of the candidates, after giving them one month's notice, who possessed such degree. Thereafter a notice was given to the petitioner and the petitioner replied the same. After considering the reply, the petitioner was terminated from service, vide order dt. 21.3.94 (Anx.3) w.e.f. 23.2.94. The petitioner has further alleged that he was pressed to seek resignation but that is irrelevant as the same was not accepted. The petitioner has alleged that the Government vide orders Anx.4 and 5 directed to impart training to those teachers who were given substantive appointment and were in service, and preferred the writ petition.

(3.) AS agreed by the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.