KALU Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE facts of this case are little complicated but not difficult to resolve. Respondent no. 4 Mohammed Haneef applied to the Municipal Council,churu for permission to raise Balcony on Government land. THE Municipal Council, Churu declined the permission and against that order he filed an appeal before the Collector, Churu. THE appeal was rejected vide Ex. 2 dt. 23rd of Mareh,1976. He then went in revision under section 300 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act before the Board of Revenue.

(2.) WHILE the appeal was pending before the Collector, Churu, Kalu and others purchased the strip of Government land over which the respondent no. 4 wanted to raise Balcony vide sale-deed dt. 19th of February,1976 and because of this purchase Kalu and others became party before the Collector,churu. Similarly they were made parties in the revision before the Board of Revenue.

(3.) AGAINST the order of remand passed by the Board of Revenue, the vendees Kalu etc. have come to this Court.