MOOL CHAND VERMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONERS this case are regularly in appointed Tehsildars, promoted from subordinate service in accordance with the provisions of Rajasthan Tehsildars Service Rules, 1956 ( for short, 'the Rules')- Petitioner Mool Chand was promoted vide order dated 22. 1. 1990 against the vacancy of the year 1988-89. Peititionrs Lal Mohan & Rikhab Chand were promoted vide order dated 18. 11. 1993 against the vacancy of the year 1991- 92. PETITIONERS Bhagwan Singh & Ghasi Ram were also promoted vide order dated 18. 11. 1993 against the vacancy of the year 1992-93.

(2.) THE order dated 22. 01. 1990 (Annexure 1) by which petitioner Mool Chand was promoted, stipulated that he shall be on probation of one year, and further that, he would be confirmed on the post of Tehsildar only after he has passed departmental examination. THE orders dated 18. 11. 1993 (Annexure 2 & 3) by which Lal Mohan Rikhab Chand. Bhagwan Singh, & Ghasi Ram were promoted as Tehsildars, do also make similar stipulations. All the petitioners were sent for training in a condensed course of 16 weeks at the All Purposes Revenue Training School, Tonk, and all of them successfully completed their training.

(3.) SHRI Sanjay Pareek, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that first controversy regarding cut-off dated in Rule 14 (d) of the Tehsildars Departmental Examination Rules, is squarely concluded by DB decision of this Court rendered in Basliram Mangal Vs. State of Rajasthan & others (1) wherein similar cut-off date incorporated in similar provisions of Rajasthan Civil Services ( Departmental Examinations ) Rules, 1959 was struck down by this court,. On the second point, his contention is that the petitioners could not be made to suffer pecuniary loss because of the inaction on the part of the respondents in not filling the vacancies yearwise timely.