REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

MOHAN Appellant

V/S

BHAIRON SINGH SHEKHAWAT Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

JAGAN NATH VS. JASWANT SINGH [REFERRED TO]
K KAMARAJA NADAR MARIAPPAN M R MASANI VS. KUNJU THEIVAR:V R NEDUNCHEZHIYAN:THE ELEPTION TRIBUNAL RANCHI [REFERRED TO]
RAM DIAL VS. SANT LAL [REFERRED TO]
SHUBNATH DEOGAM VS. RAM NARAIN PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
BALWAN SINGH VS. LAKSHMI NARAIN [REFERRED TO]
JAGDEV SINGH SIDHANTI VS. PRATAP SINGH DAULTA [REFERRED TO]
KULTAR SINGH VS. MAKHTIAR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
RAMANBHAI ASHABHAI PATEL VS. DABHI AJITKUMAR FULSINJI [REFERRED TO]
NARBADA PRASAD VS. CHHAGANLAL [REFERRED TO]
SAMANT N BALKRISHNA VS. GEORGE FERNANDEZ [REFERRED TO]
UDHAV SINGH VS. MADHAV RAO SCINDIA [REFERRED TO]
M KAMALAM VS. V A SYED MOHAMMED [REFERRED TO]
K M MANI JOSEPH THOMAS VS. P J ANTONY:P J ANTONY [REFERRED TO]
EBRAHIM SULEIMAN SAIT VS. M C MOHAMMED [REFERRED TO]
ROOP LAL SATHI VS. NACHHATTAR SINGH GILL [REFERRED TO]
M KARUNANIDHI R RANGASAMI A CHINNADURAI R PERIASAMY A CHINDRASEKHARAN VS. H V HANDE AND OTHRS:C R RAJAPPA:V PERUMAL NAINAR:T P K JAYARAJ:P S MANIAN [REFERRED TO]
S HARCHARAN SINGH VS. S SAJJAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
AZHAR HUSAIN VS. RAJIV GANDHI [REFERRED TO]
U S SASIDHARAN VS. K KARUNAKARAN [REFERRED TO]
LAXMI NARAYAN NAYAK VS. RAMRATAN CHATURVEDI [REFERRED TO]
M J ZAKHARIA SAIT VS. T M MOHAMMED [REFERRED TO]
F A SAPA VAIVENGA SAIKAPTHIANGA ZALAWMA LALHUTHANGA VS. SINGORA:ZONUNTHARA:HRANGTHASANGA:T ROZAMA:ROMANA [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN RAWALE VS. DAMODAR TATYABA ALIAS DADASAHEB [REFERRED TO]
GADAKH YASHWANTRAO KANKARRAO VS. E V ALIAS BALASAHEB VIKHE PATIL [REFERRED TO]
S R BOMMAI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
NARAIN CHAND PRASHAR VS. PREM KUMAR DHUMAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This election petition has been filed by the petitioner (an elector) for declaring the election of the respondent (returned candidate) as a Member of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly from Bali constituency as void on the ground of corrupt practices. Paras Nos. 7 and 8 of the election petition contain averments regarding them.

(2.) Para No. 7 runs as under:-

(3.) The relevant portions of para No. 8 run as under: - "8. That the material facts and the particulars in support thereof and the grounds in respect of the corrupt practices mentioned in the foregoing para are set out in the ensuing paragraphs:- (a). That Shri Bhairon Singh Shekhawat addressed several election meetings on 27-10-1993 from the forenoon up to the midnight while starting tile election campaign in the Constituency in question as detailed hereunder: In the aforesaid meetings the respondent on a public address system made an appeal in the name of Lord Ram, the main theme of which was the seeking votes in the name of Ram and also referred to the demolition of the structure of Babri Masjid at Ayodhya, for promoting hatred between different classes of India on the ground of religion and community for furtherance of the prospects of his lection. He also appealed to the voters by using religious symbol of Goddess Laxmi and also made an appeal to the voters to put their seal on Kamal because on the date of polling there was 'Dhan Teras' and Laxmi had originated from Kamal. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx (d) In the Falna Speech, he incited the Hindus in the background of demolition of structure of Babri Masjid on 6-12-92 as also construction of the Ram Temple. The highlights and features of the aforesaid speech are quoted hereunder :-

Click here to view full judgment.

MOHAN Vs. BHAIRON SINGH SHEKHAWAT

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address