MOOLYA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON the request of learned Counsel for the accused appellants as well as learned Public Prosecutor, arguments were heard in the main appeal.

(2.) THIS appeal by accused persons Moolya and Gangadhar is directed against the judgment of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dausa, district Jaipur, dated 12 -1 -1983, convicting the accused Mooliya under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and sentencing to life imprisonment and under Section 323 IPC six months rigorous imprisonment and accused Gangadhar under Section 302 IPC and 302/34 IPC and a sentence of imprisonment for life and under Section 323 IPC one year's rigorous imprisonment.

(3.) THE accused persons tenied the charges and claimed to be tried. The prosecution in support of its case, examined 13 witnesses and no evidence was led by the defence. Learned Additional Sessions Judge believed the prosecution case and convicted and sentenced the accused appellant in the manner indicated above.