HARI SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for both the parties, and also perused the judgment of the Special Judge, who has tried this case and discussed in his judgment, the entire evidence and the various aspects of this case.

(2.) THIS is a case under the Essential Commodities Act, (hereinafter for short, 'the Act'), and the appellants were exporting wheat contravening the provisions of the Act.

(3.) ALL these aspects were considered by the learned Special Judge in his judgment, and he has disbelieved the contention of the accused persons. I think that the learned Special Judge has not committed any error in disbelieving the defence story.