(1.) THIS is a defendant's revision application against an order of the Additional Civil Judge, Jaipur City, holding that the suit document is admissible in evidence.
(2.) THE contention on behalf of the applicant is that the document amounts to a promissory note and that it is not sufficiently stamped. THE trial court held that the document is not a promissory note and further, that even assuming that it is a promissory note it is duly stamped.