HEERALAL Vs. MAHADEO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a first appeal by Heeralal and Hansraj against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Churu.

(2.) THE suit, out of which this appeal has arisen, was brought by Mahadeo, Tarachand and Rameshwar. THEir case was that they had 3/4ths share in certain property situate in Sujangarh and that this share was not liable to be attached in the decree obtained by Heeralal and Hansraj defendant appellants against Ladhuram and his son Jairam. THE defendants had attached one house and half share in another in Sujangarh in execution of the decree which they had obtained against Laduram and his son Jairam on the 31st October, 1936. THE plaintiff's case was that 3/4ths share in one house and 1/2 of the attached share in the other house were not liable to be attached as the plaintiffs had 3/4ths share in the entirely of both the houses. THE plaintiffs based their case on the following pedigree - Balooram Binjraj Nanagram (died sonless) Jagannath Laduram (Deft.) Mahadeo (Pltf. 1) Gordhan Jairam (Deft.) Ghanshyam Doongar Ram Rameshwar (Went in Adoption)