KUNDAN Vs. MOOLCHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a petition under Art 226 of the Constitution of India.

(2.) THE non-petitioner, Moolchand, had made an application under sec. 7 of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance for re-instatement on certain land alleged to be in his possession and of which it was said that he had been dispossessed by Kundan. THE application was once dismissed for (default, but was restored on an application made in that behalf, and after enquiry the order of reinstatement was nude. THE petitioner Kundan filed a revision to the Board of Revenue and contended that the Anti-ejectment Officer had no jurisdiction to restore the petition. THE objection was over-ruled.