AMIRCHAND Vs. VAID RAMCHANDRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision against an order of the learned Munsif, Jaipur East, rejecting the objections of the petitioners in execution proceedings.

(2.) THE non-petitioner Vaid Ramchandra obtained a decree for ejectment against his tenant Raghunath on the 3rd of October, 1949. In execution of the decree the petitioners Amir Chand and Kishan Chand objected on the allegations that they had obtained a sub-lease from Raghunath, and were not liable to ejectment as they had not been made parties to the suit, in which the decree had been obtained. THE learned Munsif relying on Sailendra Nath Bhattacharjee vs. Bijanlal Chakravarty (l) held that the determination of the lease amounted to a determination of the sub-lease as well, and the objectors had no right to resist delivery of possession.