JAI RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present bail application has been filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.211/2022 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Barmer for the offences punishable under Ss. 498-A and 304-B of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner for abetment to commit the suicide. Challan of the present case has already been presented under Ss. 306 and 498-A IPC and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

(2.) Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

(3.) Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Jai Ram @ Jagdish S/o Lala Ram, shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.211/2022 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Barmer provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000.00 with two sureties of Rs.50,000.00 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.